Derek Sullivan
Sullivan & Associates
- City
- Austin
Business Law ยท Sub-Practice
The deal that looks good at the letter of intent can unravel in due diligence. Structure and disclosure separate successful transactions from costly ones.
ยง Overview
Buying or selling a business is one of the most complex legal and financial transactions an owner or company undertakes. M&A counsel manages the deal structure, due diligence, negotiation, and documentation.
M&A transactions take two primary forms: asset purchases (the buyer acquires specific assets and selects which liabilities to assume) and stock/equity purchases (the buyer acquires the ownership of the entity, inheriting all assets and liabilities). From the seller's perspective, stock sales are often preferred because they're simpler and may generate capital gains tax treatment. Buyers often prefer asset purchases to control which liabilities they assume. The deal process moves from letter of intent (LOI) โ a non-binding framework for the key terms โ through due diligence (the buyer's comprehensive review of the target's financials, contracts, IP, litigation, real estate, and more), definitive agreement drafting (Asset Purchase Agreement or Stock Purchase Agreement), regulatory review if required, closing conditions and mechanics, and post-closing integration or adjustment provisions like escrow holdbacks, earnouts, and representations and warranties insurance.
ยง Key considerations
ยง How attorneys approach this
โEarnout provisions โ where part of the purchase price is paid based on post-closing performance โ are one of the most litigated aspects of M&A agreements. They create the right incentive in theory (seller gets paid for actual results) but in practice, they are nearly impossible to draft in a way that eliminates disputes. Sellers argue buyers manage the business to minimize earnout payments; buyers argue sellers are unrealistic about post-close performance. The more complex the earnout mechanics, the more likely they are to be disputed. Simple earnouts tied to objective metrics like revenue (not EBITDA, which is subject to too many accounting choices) with short performance periods are the least controversial. If your deal requires an earnout, get a lawyer who has litigated earnout disputes โ they draft them very differently.โ
ยง What to look for in an attorney
ยง Ask these at your consultation
6 questions that matter
ยง Frequently asked questions
Q 01
Due diligence is the buyer's comprehensive investigation of the target before committing to the acquisition. Financial due diligence reviews the quality and sustainability of earnings, balance sheet accuracy, and financial controls. Legal due diligence covers contracts (customer, vendor, IP, employment), litigation history and pending claims, intellectual property ownership and freedom to operate, regulatory compliance, and real estate. HR due diligence examines employment agreements, benefit plans, worker classification, and cultural issues. The goal is to verify what the seller has represented, identify undisclosed liabilities, assess integration risk, and support purchase price negotiations. Significant issues found in diligence can justify price reductions, additional indemnification, or walking away.
Q 02
Representations and warranty (R&W) insurance covers losses arising from breaches of seller's representations and warranties in the purchase agreement. It allows buyers to make claims against an insurance policy rather than โ or in addition to โ the seller directly. For sellers, it provides a clean exit with limited post-closing indemnification exposure. For buyers, it provides a deep-pocketed counterparty and longer claim periods. R&W insurance has become standard on middle-market deals ($10M+) and is increasingly common on smaller transactions. Premiums are typically 2-4% of the coverage amount. The policy is negotiated alongside the purchase agreement โ a law firm with R&W insurance experience can help structure it efficiently.
Q 03
A letter of intent sets out the key economic and structural terms of a proposed acquisition: purchase price, deal structure, earnout framework, exclusivity period, and major conditions. Most LOI provisions are explicitly non-binding โ the parties acknowledge that either side can walk away before signing the definitive purchase agreement. However, certain LOI provisions are typically binding: exclusivity (the seller won't negotiate with other buyers during the agreed period), confidentiality, and governing law. Sellers should be careful about agreeing to extended exclusivity periods before due diligence has revealed potential problems, and both sides should be careful about provisions that create implied obligations even in "non-binding" LOIs.
Q 04
Technically yes โ but it's one of the highest-risk decisions a buyer can make. Business acquisitions involve complex purchase agreements with representations, warranties, indemnification obligations, and post-closing adjustments that can expose a buyer to enormous post-closing liability if negotiated poorly. Due diligence conducted without legal support misses contract change-of-control provisions, IP ownership gaps, undisclosed litigation, and regulatory issues. Sellers typically have legal representation โ a buyer without counsel is at a significant disadvantage in negotiation. M&A legal fees are a small fraction of the purchase price and the potential post-closing liability exposure. Treating legal counsel as optional in a business acquisition is rarely the right trade-off.
ยง Featured attorneys
Sullivan & Associates
Rodriguez & Associates
Brooks Business Counsel
Stein Property Law
Thompson Estate Planning
Nakamura IP Group
ยง Related practice areas
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.